Montag - Marienhof, Neustadt - 25.11.2024
Privatscore für NN – Fr. Hellwig (1)
Runde 1 | gegen 12: Fr. Weidemann – Fr. Schaefer (48,21 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 58,33 % |
Board 1 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ +1 | ♣K | +450 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 2 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ +1 | ♥5 | +140 | = | 2,0 MP | -- | 25,00 % |
Board 3 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA +4 | ♥4 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 9: Fr. Hinrichsen – Fr. Drichel (47,80 %) | 9,5 MP | = | 39,58 % |
Board 22 | Nord-Süd | S 2SA +1 | ♠8 | +150 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 1SA = | ♣2 | −90 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 24 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -2 | ♥4 | +100 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 10: NN – DÖ (50,18 %) | 15,8 MP | = | 65,63 % |
Board 16 | Ost-West | O 2♠ = | ♣B | −110 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 17 | Ost-West | O 3♥ -1 | ♠A | +50 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 18 | Ost-West | O 2♥ = | ♦2 | −110 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 6: Fr. Dittmer – Hr. Dittmer (52,80 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 45,83 % |
Board 19 | Ost-West | W 4♣ +1 | ♦K | −150 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 20 | Ost-West | S 3♠ = | ♥4 | +140 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 21 | Ost-West | N 2♣ +2 | ♦9 | +130 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 8: SW – AE (41,85 %) | 15,8 MP | = | 65,63 % |
Board 7 | Ost-West | W 3♣ +2 | ♦2 | −150 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 8 | Ost-West | O 1SA +3 | ♠9 | −180 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 9 | Ost-West | N 2SA = | ♥5 | +120 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 2: Fr. Behrens – FO (51,55 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 41,67 % |
Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA = | ♠D | +90 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 12,50 % |
Board 11 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ -4 | ♦2 | −200 | = | 2,0 MP | -- | 25,00 % |
Board 12 | Nord-Süd | N 4♥ +1 | ♦D | +650 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ | 87,50 % |
Aufwertung | für 3 Boards: je 4,2 MP | 12,7 MP |
Ergebnis: 2. Rang mit 88,7 MP = 52,80 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Behrens – FO (2)
Runde 1 | gegen 5: Fr. Skoczylas – Fr. Weinreich (48,39 %) | 9,5 MP | = | 39,58 % |
Board 7 | Nord-Süd | N 2♦ +2 | ♠3 | +130 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 1SA +1 | ♠5 | −120 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 9 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA -1 | ♥5 | −50 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 12: Fr. Weidemann – Fr. Schaefer (48,21 %) | 13,3 MP | = | 55,21 % |
Board 4 | Ost-West | S 3SA -1 | ♣8 | −100 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Board 5 | Ost-West | N 2♠ -1 | ♦D | −100 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 6 | Ost-West | N 4♥ = | ♣3 | +420 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 9: Fr. Hinrichsen – Fr. Drichel (47,80 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 66,67 % |
Board 1 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ = | ♦8 | +420 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 2 | Nord-Süd | S 5♦ +2 | ♣A | +640 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ | 87,50 % |
Board 3 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA +4 | ♠3 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 10: NN – DÖ (50,18 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 70,83 % |
Board 19 | Ost-West | W 3♣ +2 | ♦9 | −150 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 20 | Ost-West | O 3♥ +1 | ♦2 | −170 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ | 75,00 % |
Board 21 | Ost-West | N 3SA -1 | ♦6 | −100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 7: BS – BN (48,99 %) | 4,5 MP | = | 18,75 % |
Board 22 | Ost-West | N 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 23 | Ost-West | O 3SA -2 | ♣4 | +200 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 24 | Ost-West | O 3♣ X -1 | ♠D | +100 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 1: NN – Fr. Hellwig (52,80 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 58,33 % |
Board 10 | Ost-West | N 1SA = | ♠D | +90 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ | 87,50 % |
Board 11 | Ost-West | S 4♥ -4 | ♦2 | −200 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ | 75,00 % |
Board 12 | Ost-West | N 4♥ +1 | ♦D | +650 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 12,50 % |
Aufwertung | für 3 Boards: je 4,1 MP | 12,4 MP |
Ergebnis: 4. Rang mit 86,6 MP = 51,55 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Rieger-Kasten – Fr. Benz (3)
Runde 1 | gegen 4: Fr. Hapke – Fr. Beth (59,88 %) | 10,8 MP | = | 44,79 % |
Board 16 | Nord-Süd | W 2♦ = | ♥A | −90 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 17 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ -1 | ♥10 | −50 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 18 | Nord-Süd | N 2♦ -1 | ♣2 | −100 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 6: Fr. Dittmer – Hr. Dittmer (52,80 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 33,33 % |
Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA = | ♣2 | +90 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 12,50 % |
Board 11 | Nord-Süd | W 4♠ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 12 | Nord-Süd | N 4♥ +1 | ♦A | +650 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ | 87,50 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 12: Fr. Weidemann – Fr. Schaefer (48,21 %) | 15,8 MP | = | 65,63 % |
Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 2♥ -2 | ♣10 | +200 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -2 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 9 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA -1 | ♥5 | −50 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 9: Fr. Hinrichsen – Fr. Drichel (47,80 %) | 13,3 MP | = | 55,21 % |
Board 4 | Ost-West | N 3SA -2 | ♣B | −200 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 5 | Ost-West | O 5♦ -4 | ♠A | +200 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 6 | Ost-West | S 3SA = | ♣4 | +400 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 10: NN – DÖ (50,18 %) | 8,3 MP | = | 34,38 % |
Board 22 | Nord-Süd | N 2SA +2 | ♠2 | +180 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 23 | Nord-Süd | W 3♦ -1 | ♣9 | +100 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 24 | Nord-Süd | S 3♥ -2 | ♠2 | −100 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 8: SW – AE (41,85 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 58,33 % |
Board 1 | Ost-West | N 3♦ = | ♣A | +110 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ | 75,00 % |
Board 2 | Ost-West | S 4♦ +3 | ♣A | +190 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Board 3 | Ost-West | O 3SA +4 | ♠3 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Aufwertung | für 3 Boards: je 3,9 MP | 11,7 MP |
Ergebnis: 7. Rang mit 81,7 MP = 48,63 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Hapke – Fr. Beth (4)
Runde 1 | gegen 3: Fr. Rieger-Kasten – Fr. Benz (48,63 %) | 13,3 MP | = | 55,21 % |
Board 16 | Ost-West | W 2♦ = | ♥A | −90 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 17 | Ost-West | S 3♠ -1 | ♥10 | −50 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 18 | Ost-West | N 2♦ -1 | ♣2 | −100 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 5: Fr. Skoczylas – Fr. Weinreich (48,39 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
Board 19 | Nord-Süd | W 4♣ +1 | ♦K | −150 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 20 | Nord-Süd | S 2♠ +1 | ♥4 | +140 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 21 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +2 | ♠3 | +660 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 7: BS – BN (48,99 %) | 19,5 MP | = | 81,25 % |
Board 13 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA +2 | ♥B | +660 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ -1 | ♦10 | −50 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 15 | Nord-Süd | O 3♣ +2 | ♥A | −150 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 12: Fr. Weidemann – Fr. Schaefer (48,21 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
Board 10 | Ost-West | N 2SA = | ♣2 | +120 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 11 | Ost-West | S 4♥ -3 | ♠A | −150 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Board 12 | Ost-West | S 3♠ = | ♣9 | +140 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 9: Fr. Hinrichsen – Fr. Drichel (47,80 %) | 14,5 MP | = | 60,42 % |
Board 7 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ -2 | ♦B | +200 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 2♦ +2 | ♠5 | −130 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 9 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA = | ♥5 | +90 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 10: NN – DÖ (50,18 %) | 9,0 MP | = | 37,50 % |
Board 1 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ = | ♦8 | +420 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 2 | Nord-Süd | N 1♠ = | ♥5 | +80 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 3 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA +4 | ♠7 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Aufwertung | für 3 Boards: je 4,8 MP | 14,4 MP |
Ergebnis: 1. Rang mit 100,6 MP = 59,88 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Skoczylas – Fr. Weinreich (5)
Runde 1 | gegen 2: Fr. Behrens – FO (51,55 %) | 14,5 MP | = | 60,42 % |
Board 7 | Ost-West | N 2♦ +2 | ♠3 | +130 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 8 | Ost-West | O 1SA +1 | ♠5 | −120 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 9 | Ost-West | N 1SA -1 | ♥5 | −50 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 4: Fr. Hapke – Fr. Beth (59,88 %) | 6,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
Board 19 | Ost-West | W 4♣ +1 | ♦K | −150 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 20 | Ost-West | S 2♠ +1 | ♥4 | +140 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 21 | Ost-West | S 3SA +2 | ♠3 | +660 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 6: Fr. Dittmer – Hr. Dittmer (52,80 %) | 10,8 MP | = | 44,79 % |
Board 22 | Nord-Süd | S 2♣ = | ♥A | +90 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -3 | ♣4 | +300 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 24 | Nord-Süd | O 3♣ -1 | ♠D | +50 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 8: SW – AE (41,85 %) | 13,3 MP | = | 55,21 % |
Board 16 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA +2 | ♠3 | +150 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 17 | Nord-Süd | S 2♠ +2 | ♦A | +170 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 18 | Nord-Süd | O 3♥ = | ♦B | −140 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 12: Fr. Weidemann – Fr. Schaefer (48,21 %) | 15,8 MP | = | 65,63 % |
Board 13 | Ost-West | N 5♣ -1 | ♥6 | −100 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 14 | Ost-West | S 4♠ -2 | ♦10 | −100 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Board 15 | Ost-West | O 2SA +1 | ♥A | −150 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 9: Fr. Hinrichsen – Fr. Drichel (47,80 %) | 14,0 MP | = | 58,33 % |
Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA +1 | ♣2 | +120 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 11 | Nord-Süd | S 2♥ -2 | ♠A | −100 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ | 75,00 % |
Board 12 | Nord-Süd | N 2♥ +1 | ♣3 | +140 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 10: NN – DÖ (50,18 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 29,17 % |
Board 4 | Ost-West | N 2♠ +2 | ♣B | +170 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 5 | Ost-West | N 2♠ = | ♥6 | +110 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 6 | Ost-West | N 4♥ = | ♠7 | +420 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Ergebnis: 8. Rang mit 81,3 MP = 48,39 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Dittmer – Hr. Dittmer (6)
Runde 2 | gegen 3: Fr. Rieger-Kasten – Fr. Benz (48,63 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 66,67 % |
Board 10 | Ost-West | N 1SA = | ♣2 | +90 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ | 87,50 % |
Board 11 | Ost-West | W 4♠ = | ♣A | −420 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 12 | Ost-West | N 4♥ +1 | ♦A | +650 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 12,50 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 5: Fr. Skoczylas – Fr. Weinreich (48,39 %) | 13,3 MP | = | 55,21 % |
Board 22 | Ost-West | S 2♣ = | ♥A | +90 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 23 | Ost-West | O 3SA -3 | ♣4 | +300 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 24 | Ost-West | O 3♣ -1 | ♠D | +50 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 7: BS – BN (48,99 %) | 11,0 MP | = | 45,83 % |
Board 1 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ -2 | ♣K | −100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 2 | Nord-Süd | S 5♦ +2 | ♣A | +640 | = | 7,0 MP | +++ | 87,50 % |
Board 3 | Nord-Süd | W 3SA +4 | ♥4 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 1: NN – Fr. Hellwig (52,80 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 54,17 % |
Board 19 | Nord-Süd | W 4♣ +1 | ♦K | −150 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 20 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ = | ♥4 | +140 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 2♣ +2 | ♦9 | +130 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 12: Fr. Weidemann – Fr. Schaefer (48,21 %) | 8,3 MP | = | 34,38 % |
Board 16 | Ost-West | O 3♠ -2 | ♥B | +200 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 17 | Ost-West | S 4♠ -3 | ♣A | −150 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 18 | Ost-West | N 2♦ = | ♣B | +90 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 9: Fr. Hinrichsen – Fr. Drichel (47,80 %) | 14,5 MP | = | 60,42 % |
Board 13 | Ost-West | N 3♣ +3 | ♥6 | +170 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 14 | Ost-West | S 4♠ -2 | ♦10 | −100 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Board 15 | Ost-West | S 2♥ X -1 | ♣A | −200 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Aufwertung | für 3 Boards: je 4,2 MP | 12,7 MP |
Ergebnis: 2. Rang mit 88,7 MP = 52,80 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für BS – BN (7)
Runde 1 | gegen 10: NN – DÖ (50,18 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 66,67 % |
Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 1SA +2 | ♣A | +150 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 11 | Nord-Süd | O 4♦ -1 | ♥9 | +50 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 12 | Nord-Süd | N 4♥ -1 | ♦A | −100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 4: Fr. Hapke – Fr. Beth (59,88 %) | 4,5 MP | = | 18,75 % |
Board 13 | Ost-West | S 3SA +2 | ♥B | +660 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 14 | Ost-West | S 3♠ -1 | ♦10 | −50 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 15 | Ost-West | O 3♣ +2 | ♥A | −150 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 6: Fr. Dittmer – Hr. Dittmer (52,80 %) | 13,0 MP | = | 54,17 % |
Board 1 | Ost-West | S 4♥ -2 | ♣K | −100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 2 | Ost-West | S 5♦ +2 | ♣A | +640 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 12,50 % |
Board 3 | Ost-West | W 3SA +4 | ♥4 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 8: SW – AE (41,85 %) | 9,5 MP | = | 39,58 % |
Board 4 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA -1 | ♠3 | −100 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Board 5 | Nord-Süd | S 3♥ +1 | ♦2 | +170 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 6 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ -1 | ♦2 | −50 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 2: Fr. Behrens – FO (51,55 %) | 19,5 MP | = | 81,25 % |
Board 22 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA = | ♠2 | +400 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 23 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA -2 | ♣4 | +200 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 24 | Nord-Süd | O 3♣ X -1 | ♠D | +100 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 12: Fr. Weidemann – Fr. Schaefer (48,21 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 33,33 % |
Board 19 | Ost-West | N 4♦ -3 | ♠A | −150 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 20 | Ost-West | O 4♥ X -1 | ♦2 | +200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 21 | Ost-West | N 3♣ +1 | ♣8 | +130 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Aufwertung | für 3 Boards: je 3,9 MP | 11,8 MP |
Ergebnis: 6. Rang mit 82,3 MP = 48,99 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für SW – AE (8)
Runde 1 | gegen 9: Fr. Hinrichsen – Fr. Drichel (47,80 %) | 6,0 MP | = | 25,00 % |
Board 19 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ +1 | ♦3 | −650 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 20 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ -2 | ♥4 | −200 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA +1 | ♦6 | +630 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ | 75,00 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 10: NN – DÖ (50,18 %) | 10,8 MP | = | 44,79 % |
Board 13 | Nord-Süd | N 4♣ +1 | ♥6 | +150 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 14 | Nord-Süd | O 3♦ -4 | ♥10 | +200 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 15 | Nord-Süd | S 3♥ -3 | ♣6 | −300 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 5: Fr. Skoczylas – Fr. Weinreich (48,39 %) | 10,8 MP | = | 44,79 % |
Board 16 | Ost-West | N 1SA +2 | ♠3 | +150 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 17 | Ost-West | S 2♠ +2 | ♦A | +170 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 18 | Ost-West | O 3♥ = | ♦B | −140 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 7: BS – BN (48,99 %) | 14,5 MP | = | 60,42 % |
Board 4 | Ost-West | N 3SA -1 | ♠3 | −100 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Board 5 | Ost-West | S 3♥ +1 | ♦2 | +170 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 6 | Ost-West | S 4♥ -1 | ♦2 | −50 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 1: NN – Fr. Hellwig (52,80 %) | 8,3 MP | = | 34,38 % |
Board 7 | Nord-Süd | W 3♣ +2 | ♦2 | −150 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 8 | Nord-Süd | O 1SA +3 | ♠9 | −180 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 9 | Nord-Süd | N 2SA = | ♥5 | +120 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 3: Fr. Rieger-Kasten – Fr. Benz (48,63 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 41,67 % |
Board 1 | Nord-Süd | N 3♦ = | ♣A | +110 | = | 2,0 MP | -- | 25,00 % |
Board 2 | Nord-Süd | S 4♦ +3 | ♣A | +190 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Board 3 | Nord-Süd | O 3SA +4 | ♠3 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Aufwertung | für 3 Boards: je 3,3 MP | 10,0 MP |
Ergebnis: 11. Rang mit 70,3 MP = 41,85 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Hinrichsen – Fr. Drichel (9)
Runde 1 | gegen 8: SW – AE (41,85 %) | 18,0 MP | = | 75,00 % |
Board 19 | Ost-West | O 4♥ +1 | ♦3 | −650 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 20 | Ost-West | S 3♠ -2 | ♥4 | −200 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 21 | Ost-West | N 3SA +1 | ♦6 | +630 | = | 2,0 MP | -- | 25,00 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 1: NN – Fr. Hellwig (52,80 %) | 14,5 MP | = | 60,42 % |
Board 22 | Ost-West | S 2SA +1 | ♠8 | +150 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 23 | Ost-West | O 1SA = | ♣2 | −90 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 24 | Ost-West | O 3SA -2 | ♥4 | +100 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 2: Fr. Behrens – FO (51,55 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 33,33 % |
Board 1 | Ost-West | S 4♥ = | ♦8 | +420 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 2 | Ost-West | S 5♦ +2 | ♣A | +640 | = | 1,0 MP | --- | 12,50 % |
Board 3 | Ost-West | O 3SA +4 | ♠3 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 3: Fr. Rieger-Kasten – Fr. Benz (48,63 %) | 10,8 MP | = | 44,79 % |
Board 4 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA -2 | ♣B | −200 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 5 | Nord-Süd | O 5♦ -4 | ♠A | +200 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 6 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA = | ♣4 | +400 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 4: Fr. Hapke – Fr. Beth (59,88 %) | 9,5 MP | = | 39,58 % |
Board 7 | Ost-West | O 2♠ -2 | ♦B | +200 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Board 8 | Ost-West | O 2♦ +2 | ♠5 | −130 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 9 | Ost-West | N 1SA = | ♥5 | +90 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 5: Fr. Skoczylas – Fr. Weinreich (48,39 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 41,67 % |
Board 10 | Ost-West | N 1SA +1 | ♣2 | +120 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 11 | Ost-West | S 2♥ -2 | ♠A | −100 | = | 2,0 MP | -- | 25,00 % |
Board 12 | Ost-West | N 2♥ +1 | ♣3 | +140 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 6: Fr. Dittmer – Hr. Dittmer (52,80 %) | 9,5 MP | = | 39,58 % |
Board 13 | Nord-Süd | N 3♣ +3 | ♥6 | +170 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ -2 | ♦10 | −100 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Board 15 | Nord-Süd | S 2♥ X -1 | ♣A | −200 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Ergebnis: 10. Rang mit 80,3 MP = 47,80 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für NN – DÖ (10)
Runde 1 | gegen 7: BS – BN (48,99 %) | 8,0 MP | = | 33,33 % |
Board 10 | Ost-West | N 1SA +2 | ♣A | +150 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 11 | Ost-West | O 4♦ -1 | ♥9 | +50 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 12 | Ost-West | N 4♥ -1 | ♦A | −100 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 8: SW – AE (41,85 %) | 13,3 MP | = | 55,21 % |
Board 13 | Ost-West | N 4♣ +1 | ♥6 | +150 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 14 | Ost-West | O 3♦ -4 | ♥10 | +200 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 15 | Ost-West | S 3♥ -3 | ♣6 | −300 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 1: NN – Fr. Hellwig (52,80 %) | 8,3 MP | = | 34,38 % |
Board 16 | Nord-Süd | O 2♠ = | ♣B | −110 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 17 | Nord-Süd | O 3♥ -1 | ♠A | +50 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 18 | Nord-Süd | O 2♥ = | ♦2 | −110 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 2: Fr. Behrens – FO (51,55 %) | 7,0 MP | = | 29,17 % |
Board 19 | Nord-Süd | W 3♣ +2 | ♦9 | −150 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 20 | Nord-Süd | O 3♥ +1 | ♦2 | −170 | = | 2,0 MP | -- | 25,00 % |
Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 3SA -1 | ♦6 | −100 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 3: Fr. Rieger-Kasten – Fr. Benz (48,63 %) | 15,8 MP | = | 65,63 % |
Board 22 | Ost-West | N 2SA +2 | ♠2 | +180 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 23 | Ost-West | W 3♦ -1 | ♣9 | +100 | = | 5,3 MP | + | 65,63 % |
Board 24 | Ost-West | S 3♥ -2 | ♠2 | −100 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 4: Fr. Hapke – Fr. Beth (59,88 %) | 15,0 MP | = | 62,50 % |
Board 1 | Ost-West | S 4♥ = | ♦8 | +420 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Board 2 | Ost-West | N 1♠ = | ♥5 | +80 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 3 | Ost-West | O 3SA +4 | ♠7 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 5: Fr. Skoczylas – Fr. Weinreich (48,39 %) | 17,0 MP | = | 70,83 % |
Board 4 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ +2 | ♣B | +170 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ = | ♥6 | +110 | = | 2,8 MP | - | 34,38 % |
Board 6 | Nord-Süd | N 4♥ = | ♠7 | +420 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Ergebnis: 5. Rang mit 84,3 MP = 50,18 % — Top: 8 MP |
Privatscore für Fr. Weidemann – Fr. Schaefer (12)
Runde 1 | gegen 1: NN – Fr. Hellwig (52,80 %) | 10,0 MP | = | 41,67 % |
Board 1 | Ost-West | S 4♥ +1 | ♣K | +450 | = | 0,0 MP | --- | 0,00 % |
Board 2 | Ost-West | N 2♠ +1 | ♥5 | +140 | = | 6,0 MP | ++ | 75,00 % |
Board 3 | Ost-West | W 3SA +4 | ♥4 | −720 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Runde 2 | gegen 2: Fr. Behrens – FO (51,55 %) | 10,8 MP | = | 44,79 % |
Board 4 | Nord-Süd | S 3SA -1 | ♣8 | −100 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Board 5 | Nord-Süd | N 2♠ -1 | ♦D | −100 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 6 | Nord-Süd | N 4♥ = | ♣3 | +420 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Runde 3 | gegen 3: Fr. Rieger-Kasten – Fr. Benz (48,63 %) | 8,3 MP | = | 34,38 % |
Board 7 | Ost-West | W 2♥ -2 | ♣10 | +200 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Board 8 | Ost-West | O 3SA -2 | ♠5 | +100 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 9 | Ost-West | N 3SA -1 | ♥5 | −50 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Runde 4 | gegen 4: Fr. Hapke – Fr. Beth (59,88 %) | 12,0 MP | = | 50,00 % |
Board 10 | Nord-Süd | N 2SA = | ♣2 | +120 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 11 | Nord-Süd | S 4♥ -3 | ♠A | −150 | = | 4,0 MP | | 50,00 % |
Board 12 | Nord-Süd | S 3♠ = | ♣9 | +140 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Runde 5 | gegen 5: Fr. Skoczylas – Fr. Weinreich (48,39 %) | 8,3 MP | = | 34,38 % |
Board 13 | Nord-Süd | N 5♣ -1 | ♥6 | −100 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 14 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ -2 | ♦10 | −100 | = | 1,5 MP | -- | 18,75 % |
Board 15 | Nord-Süd | O 2SA +1 | ♥A | −150 | = | 6,5 MP | ++ | 81,25 % |
Runde 6 | gegen 6: Fr. Dittmer – Hr. Dittmer (52,80 %) | 15,8 MP | = | 65,63 % |
Board 16 | Nord-Süd | O 3♠ -2 | ♥B | +200 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Board 17 | Nord-Süd | S 4♠ -3 | ♣A | −150 | = | 0,3 MP | --- | 3,13 % |
Board 18 | Nord-Süd | N 2♦ = | ♣B | +90 | = | 7,8 MP | +++ | 96,88 % |
Runde 7 | gegen 7: BS – BN (48,99 %) | 16,0 MP | = | 66,67 % |
Board 19 | Nord-Süd | N 4♦ -3 | ♠A | −150 | = | 5,0 MP | + | 62,50 % |
Board 20 | Nord-Süd | O 4♥ X -1 | ♦2 | +200 | = | 8,0 MP | +++ | 100,00 % |
Board 21 | Nord-Süd | N 3♣ +1 | ♣8 | +130 | = | 3,0 MP | - | 37,50 % |
Ergebnis: 9. Rang mit 81,0 MP = 48,21 % — Top: 8 MP |